Introduction to climate change (in depth): Difference between revisions

From yconic.energypedia.info
Hector Alfaro (***** | *****)
mNo edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
Hector Alfaro (***** | *****)
mNo edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 36: Line 36:
{{Boxes Climate Change (green)
{{Boxes Climate Change (green)
| Type = Watch this
| Type = Watch this
| Content = Getting a grip on GWP – i.e. ‘global warming potential’
}}
}}
Lots of natural phenomena release GHGs. A key difference related to man-made emissions is that they often excel (in a bad way) at trapping heat in the Earth’s atmosphere. Keen to know how burning fossil fuels compares to letting cows pass gas? Or why CO2 is the ‘problem child’ of GHGs? How about the BIGGER, longer-term impacts beyond climate change? Just click ‘play’!   
Lots of natural phenomena release GHGs. A key difference related to man-made emissions is that they often excel (in a bad way) at trapping heat in the Earth’s atmosphere. Keen to know how burning fossil fuels compares to letting cows pass gas? Or why CO2 is the ‘problem child’ of GHGs? How about the BIGGER, longer-term impacts beyond climate change? Just click ‘play’!   

Revision as of 09:51, 18 August 2025

Icon-intro-climate-change.svg

Introduction to climate change

Make sure to do the Questionnaire at the end of the page! Jump directly to it by clicking here.

Climate change may seem like a recent phenomenon. But the idea that life on Earth is influenced by a ‘greenhouse gas effect’ first emerged in the early 1800s. While it wasn’t yet called that, scientists were already investigating causes and effects.


Icon-springboard.svg

Springboard


  • A brief history of climate change science
  • Tipping points, dominoes and multipliers
  • How is climate change already affecting people?

Weird weather? Or a changing climate

Almost 200 years ago, scientists found that certain gases in the atmosphere affected the Earth in two ways. First, by trapping heat from the Sun – rather than reflecting it back to the atmosphere – these gases kept the Earth’s surface temperature at around 14-15°C (57-49°F). For the record, without the greenhouse effect, the Earth's average surface temperature would plummet to −18 °C (−0.4 °F).[1][2]

In turn, this altered the energy balance – that is, the equilibrium between the energy the Planet gets from the Sun and the energy it ‘loses’ into outer space. Names to know in this early research include Joseph Fourier and Claude Pouillet.

In 1856, Eunice Newton Foote demonstrated that the Sun’s warming effect was stronger on air that contained water vapour than on dry air. Critically, she also showed that it was stronger where concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) were higher[3].

In turn, scientists began to look for clues about weather and climate patterns that pre-dated the data they could collect with the most advanced instruments of the day. The approach became known as paleoclimatology. They soon determined that past Ice Ages and other natural changes were likely linked to the greenhouse effect.

As the Industrial Revolution ramped up, some scientists argued that burning modern fuels (e.g. coal and oil) would push up emissions of the greenhouse gases (GHGs) previously identified. These include CO2, methane, chlorofluorocarbons, nitrous oxide and ozone.



Icon-watch-this.svg

Watch this

Getting a grip on GWP – i.e. ‘global warming potential’

Lots of natural phenomena release GHGs. A key difference related to man-made emissions is that they often excel (in a bad way) at trapping heat in the Earth’s atmosphere. Keen to know how burning fossil fuels compares to letting cows pass gas? Or why CO2 is the ‘problem child’ of GHGs? How about the BIGGER, longer-term impacts beyond climate change? Just click ‘play’!


References